ACLs - Konfiguration and Infos vor Developpers ============================================== ACL support for AFP is implemented with NFSv4 ACLs. Few filesystems and fewer OSes support these. At the time of implementation its only provided with ZFS on Solaris, Opensolaris and derived distributions. Configuration ------------- In order to be able to support ACLs, the following things have to be configured: 1. ZFS Volumes 2. Authentication Domain 3. Netatalk Volumes 1. ZFS Volumes: You MUST configure two ACL parameters for any volume you want to use with Netatalk: aclinherit = passthrough aclmode = passthrough For an explanation of what these parameters mean and how to apply them see, your hosts ZFS documentation (e.g. man zfs). 2. Authentication Domain Your server and the clients must be part of a security association where identity data is coming from a common source. ACLs in Darwin are based on UUIDs and so is the ACL specification in AFP 3.2. Therefor your source of identity data has to provide an attribute for every user and group where a UUID is stored as a ASCII string. In other words: - you need an Open Directory Server or an LDAP server where you store UUIDs in some attribute - your clients must be configured to use this server - your server should be configured to use this server via nsswitch and PAM. This however is not a strict requirement: if you create duplicates of every LDAP/OD user and group with identic attributes (name, uid, gid) in your local data store (/etc/[passwd|group]) things will work * as long as user/group names/ids in the filesystem are equal * * to their counterparts in the LDAP/OD datastore * - configure Netatalk via ldap.conf so that Netatalk is able to retrieve the UUID for users and groups via LDAP search queries 3. Netatalk Volumes Finally you can add "options:acls" to your volume defintions to add ACL support. In case your volume basedir doesn't grant read permissions via mode (like: 0700 root:adm) but only via ACLs, you MUST add the "nostat" option to the volume defintion. Implemantation Notes -------------------- Some implementation details that are buried in the code are worthwhile to be documented. 1. Darwin ACEs vs NFSv4 ACEs 2. .AppleDouble VFS integration 1. Darwin ACEs vs NFSv4 ACEs Basically as far as implementing AFP support is concerned they're equivalent. Subtleties arise at other places: FPAccess The AFP client frequently checks the (DARWIN_)ACE_DELETE_CHILD right. This is most often not explicitly granted via an ACE. Therefor the client would get an no access error. The client in turn then declares the object in question read only. Thus we have to the check the mode for every directory and add ACE_DELETE_CHILD if the requestor has write permissions. FPGetFileDirParms 10.5 does not only use unix mode and FPAccess for permission check, but also OS 9 access bits from FPGetFileDirParms. Thus we have to adjust the Access Rights bitmap user bits by including any ACL rigths. 2. .AppleDouble VFS integration FPSetACL sets ACLs on files and dirs. Our implementation also sets the same ACL on the .AppleDouble file for files and on the .AppleDouble dir itself for dirs. Thereafter ACLs for created files is taken care of by ACLs own inheritance rules. For dirs on the other hand whe have to make sure that any ACL the dir inherits is copied verbatim to its .AppleDouble dir. January 2009, Frank Lahm